Repo Rate Dynamics: The Role of Dealers, Hedge Funds, and Issuance

This paper analyses U.S. secured repo spreads by jointly looking into reserves, dealer balance-sheet usage, hedge fund leverage, and Treasury issuance. Using a quantile regression framework, the results show that repo market dynamics are strongly state-dependent.
READ MORE...
Volume/Issue: Volume 2026 Issue 145
Publication date: July 2026
ISBN: 9798229051668
$20.00
Add to Cart by clicking price of the language and format you'd like to purchase
Available Languages and Formats
Paperback
PDF
ePub
English
Prices in red indicate formats that are not yet available but are forthcoming.
Topics covered in this book

This title contains information about the following subjects. Click on a subject if you would like to see other titles with the same subjects.

Banks and Banking , Finance , repo , hedge funds , treasury issuance , broker-dealers , reserve demand , hedge fund activity , repo spread , repo market , hedge fund leverage , Financial statements , Hedging , Repo rates , Reserve positions , Global

Summary

This paper analyses U.S. secured repo spreads by jointly looking into reserves, dealer balance-sheet usage, hedge fund leverage, and Treasury issuance. Using a quantile regression framework, the results show that repo market dynamics are strongly state-dependent. Higher level of reserves consistently compress repo spreads to the Federal Reserve’s overninght reverse repo offering rate and remain the primary stabilizing force, particularly in tighter funding conditions. Hedge fund activity appears to amplify dealer balance-sheet pressures in lower quantiles, reflecting the impact of leveraged demand in normal markets. As spreads rise, this effect weakens. Instead, heavier Treasury issuance appears to weigh on repo spreads via its stronger effect on dealer balance sheet pressures. Overall, U.S. repo spreads are affected by the supply of central bank liquidity, demand for leverage, Treasury issuance and intermediary capacity. Crucially, these drivers are not equally relevant across the distribution of funding conditions.